|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|国际医药卫生导报|超急性期心肌梗死患者心电图特点分析

超急性期心肌梗死患者心电图特点分析OA

Analysis of electrocardiogram characteristics in patients with hyperacute myocardial infarction

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者超急性期心电图的诊断价值.方法 选取2018年1月至2023年3月在湖南省会同县人民医院胸痛中心确诊的200例AMI患者为研究对象,其中男118例,女82例,年龄31~65(48.6±7.5)岁.分析AMI超急性期的心电图表现,比较AMI典型心电图图形和心肌坏死标志物指标异常出现的时间.采用配对t检验、McNemar-Bowker Pearson卡方检验.结果 就诊即刻、30 min、1 h、2 h、3 h、4 h心律失常发生率依次为7.0%(14/200)、11.0%(22/200)、36.5%(73/200)、64.0%(128/200)、85.5%(171/200)、93.0%(186/200),前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);传导阻滞发生率依次为 2.5%(5/200)、4.5%(9/200)、11.5%(23/200)、41.5%(83/200)、61.0%(121/200)、75.5%(151/200),前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);ST段下移发生率依次为37.0%(74/200)、90.0%(180/200)、81.5%(163/200)、77.5%(155/200)、40.0%(80/200)、5.5%(11/200),前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);T波低平发生率依次为40.5%(81/200)、48.5%(97/200)、60.0%(120/200)、83.5%(167/200)、42.0%(84/200)、15.0%(30/200),前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001).AMI典型心电图图形出现时间(3.86±0.34)h滞后于心肌坏死标志物指标异常出现时间(2.75±0.22)h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 胸痛患者出现新发、频发心律失常、传导阻滞、ST段下移和T波低平改变均可能是超急性期AMI患者特有的心电图表现.

Objective To explore the diagnostic value of electrocardiogram in hyperacute myocardial infarction.Methods A total of 200 patients diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction(AMI)in the chest pain center of Huitong County People's Hospital from January 2018 to March 2023 were selected as the research objects.There were 118 males and 82 females,aged 31 to 65(48.6±7.5)years.The electrocardiogram manifestations of AMI in hyperacute stage were analyzed,and the time difference between typical electrocardiogram(ECG)pattern of AMI and abnormal myocardial necrosis markers was compared.Paired ttest and McNemar-Bowker Pearson Chi-square test were used.Results Immediately at treatment and 30 min,1 h,2 h,3 h,and 4 h after treatment,the incidences of arrhythmia were 7.0%(14/200),11.0%(22/200),36.5%(73/200),64.0%(128/200),85.5%(171/200),and 93.0%(186/200),with a statistically significant difference(P<0.001);the incidences of conduction block were 2.5%(5/200),4.5%(9/200),11.5%(23/200),41.5%(83/200),61.0%(121/200),and 75.5%(151/200),with a statistically significant difference(P<0.001);the incidences of ST segment decline were 37.0%(74/200),90.0%(180/200),81.5%(163/200),77.5%(155/200),40.0%(80/200),and 5.5%(11/200),with a statistically significant difference(P<0.001);the incidences of low and flat T wave were 40.5%(81/200),48.5%(97/200),60.0%(120/200),83.5%(167/200),42.0%(84/200),and 15.0%(30/200),with a statistically significant difference(P<0.001).The occurrence time of typical ECG pattern of AMI was longer than that of abnormal markers of myocardial necrosis[(3.86±0.34)h vs.(2.75±0.22)h],with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion New and frequent arrhythmia,conduction block,ST segment decline,and low and flat T wave in patients with chest pain may be the unique ECG manifestations of hyperacute AMI patients.

聂海华;李茂查;李阳

湖南省会同县人民医院心电图室,怀化 418300湖南省会同县人民医院心内科,怀化 418300广东医科大学顺德妇女儿童医院内科,佛山 528300

心肌梗死超急性期心电图诊断价值

Myocardial infarctionHyperacute phaseElectrocardiogramDiagnostic value

《国际医药卫生导报》 2024 (008)

1282-1285 / 4

10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.08.011

评论