|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|南水北调与水利科技(中英文)|铬污染土壤动态浸出特征及对地下水影响的模拟

铬污染土壤动态浸出特征及对地下水影响的模拟OA北大核心CSTPCD

Simulation of dynamic leaching characteristics of chromium(Ⅵ)from contaminated soil and its influence on groundwater

中文摘要英文摘要

以原长沙铬盐厂污染土壤为研究对象,利用动态淋溶试验,研究不同淋溶模式下土壤六价铬[Cr(Ⅵ)]淋出特征及其对地下水的影响.结果显示,淋溶流速会影响土柱中Cr(Ⅵ)达到解吸稳定所需要的时间,即在连续淋溶模式的高、中、低3种流速条件下,达到平衡的时间分别为1、4、15 d,而间歇淋溶模式的Cr(Ⅵ)浸出效率略低于连续淋溶模式,这主要是受到土壤中孔隙水更新效率的控制.利用COMSOL Multiphysics®5.6构建试验中Cr(Ⅵ)迁移的模型,计算连续、间歇2种淋溶模式下6种不同情景中Cr(Ⅵ)的质量浓度变化及累积浸出质量,结合模型计算与柱实验结果分析发现,当土壤中Cr(Ⅵ)质量分数达到二类用地筛选值(5.7 mg/kg)后,淋出液中Cr(Ⅵ)质量浓度仍为地下水V类水标准(0.1 mg/L),此时淋出液中Cr(Ⅵ)质量浓度仍对地下水环境造成威胁;同一时间段内,间歇淋溶柱高流速情景下有最小淋出率(33.67%),连续淋溶柱高流速情景有最大浸出率(83.99%).研究表明,在场地地下水污染治理过程中,需要考虑土壤修复标准对地下水的影响,即水土共治.研究成果可为重金属污染场地修复工程提供参考.

Hexavalent chromium Cr(Ⅵ)is a heavy metal pollutant that has attracted much attention.Due to its strong mobility,the impact of Cr(Ⅵ)contaminated soil on groundwater is one of the key issues that need to be solved in the field of soil-water synergistic remediation.At present,soil pollution and groundwater pollution remediation are still considered separately in the remediation project of chromium-contaminated sites.Research of the target values of soil and groundwater remediation lacks correlations.Few studies focused on the correlation between soil remediation targets and groundwater remediation targets.Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of the site environment and the reactivity of pollutants,the release and transformation of residual and fixed Cr(Ⅵ)in the soil making the remediation of chromium-contaminated sites remains challenging. The contaminated soil of the original Changsha Chromium Salt Plant was taken as the research object,and the dynamic leaching test was used to study the leaching characteristics of soil Cr(Ⅵ)and its influence on groundwater under different leaching modes.Seven soil columns were set up to simulate the migration of Cr(Ⅵ)in contaminated soil in the vadose zone and saturated zone.For the vadose zone scenario,pure water was used for soil column leaching to study the migration and release of Cr(Ⅵ)in the soil.The saturated zone scenario was designed with continuous and intermittent leaching conditions(leaching for 12 h,suspension for 12 h)to simulate the pumping remediation scenario of contaminated groundwater,and to study the remediation effect of different leaching modes on contaminated groundwater.The model of Cr(Ⅵ)migration and transformation in the experiment was constructed by COMSOL Multiphysics ® 5.6,and the concentration change and cumulative leaching quality of Cr(Ⅵ)in six different scenarios under continuous and intermittent leaching modes were calculated. The results showed that the leaching flow rate would affect the time required for Cr(Ⅵ)to reach desorption stability in the soil column.For continuous leaching mode,the time to reach equilibrium at high,medium,and low flow rates was 1 d,4 d,and 15 d,respectively.The leaching efficiency of Cr(Ⅵ)in intermittent leaching mode was slightly lower than that in continuous leaching mode,which was mainly controlled by the renewal efficiency of pore water in soil.Experimental calculation results showed that the leaching rate of Cr(Ⅵ)increased with the increase of flow rate under the same mode.Complex reactions happened during the intermittent leaching mode process,which may affect the final cumulative leaching mass.According to the calculation,the minimum leaching percentage was 33.67%under the high flow rate scenario of the intermittent leaching column in the same period,and the maximum leaching percentage was 83.99%under the high flow rate scenario of the continuous leaching column.Combined with the results of model calculation and column experiment,it was found that the leachate mass concentration of Cr(Ⅵ)reached the Class Ⅴ water standard of groundwater(>0.1 mg/L),even though the soil reached the screening value of Class Ⅱ land use(5.7 mg/kg).The model predicted the number of days required for different simulated columns.The days required for the 2-1,2-2,3-1,and 3-2 simulated columns leaching solutions to reach the Class Ⅳ groundwater standard were 270,230,265,and 293 days,respectively. The main conclusions are as follow:(1)The groundwater flow rate affects the time required for chromium to reach desorption equilibrium in the soil column.The influence of different leaching modes is limited.For the continuous column,under a greater flow rate,the column will reach the desorption equilibrium faster.The leaching efficiency of Cr(Ⅵ)in intermittent mode was slightly worse than that in continuous pumping mode,which was mainly controlled by the renewal efficiency of pore water in soil.(2)The cumulative leaching quality of Cr(Ⅵ)in continuous column was greater than that in intermittent column.In the same mode,the greater the leaching rate,the greater the cumulative leaching quality of Cr(Ⅵ).(3)A one-dimensional model of Cr(Ⅵ)migration and transformation was constructed using COMSOL Multiphysics ® 5.6.After verification,it was found by calculation that the intermittent leaching model can repair Cr(Ⅵ)contaminated soil more efficiently.(4)Through the model calculation,it is found that there are differences between the existing soil remediation targets and the soil remediation targets for protecting the groundwater environment.When the mass concentration of Cr(Ⅵ)in the soil medium reached the screening value of the second-class land,the content of Cr(Ⅵ)in the leachate reached the Ⅴ-class water standard,which still posed a threat to the groundwater environment. According to the results,it is found that chromium-contaminated soil can release pollutants into groundwater for a long time.Therefore,it's necessary to increase the verification steps of pollutant release in the soil at different remediation stages to ensure that the soil remediation goal of protecting the groundwater environment is achieved.For the remediation of saturated zones,based on the characteristics of different water-bearing media,the pumping remediation technology should be combined with other technologies according to the different release stages of pollutants,to achieve the goal of water and soil co-governance by efficient and economical means.

庄钧懿;王承刚;成一知;侯一哲;刘玉兰;王锴;程莉蓉;丁爱中;纪智慧;徐巍

北京师范大学水科学研究院,北京 100091||教育部地下水污染控制与修复工程研究中心,北京 100091湖南新九方科技有限公司,湖南株洲 410001北京金河水务建设集团有限公司,北京 102200大连市生态环境事务服务中心,辽宁大连 116023

环境科学

六价铬水土共治地下水柱试验数值模拟

Cr(Ⅵ)water and soil co-governancegroundwatercolumn testnumerical modeling

《南水北调与水利科技(中英文)》 2024 (002)

272-281 / 10

北京市自然科学基金面上项目(8232037)

10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2024.0029

评论