|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|大地测量与地球动力学(英文版)|Assessment of the performance of the TOPGNSS and ANN-MB antennas for ionospheric measurements using low-cost u-blox GNSS receivers

Assessment of the performance of the TOPGNSS and ANN-MB antennas for ionospheric measurements using low-cost u-blox GNSS receiversOAEI

Assessment of the performance of the TOPGNSS and ANN-MB antennas for ionospheric measurements using low-cost u-blox GNSS receivers

英文摘要

Low-cost GNSS receivers have recently been gaining reliability as good candidates for ionospheric studies.In line with these gains are genuine concerns about improving the performance of these re-ceivers.In this work,we present a comprehensive investigation of the performances of two antennas(the u-blox ANN-MB and the TOPGNSS TOP-106)used on a low-cost GNSS receiver known as the u-blox ZED-F9P.The two antennas were installed on two identical and co-located u-blox receivers.Data used from both receivers cover the period from January to June 2022.Results from the study indicate that the signal strengths are dominantly greater for the receiver with the TOPGNSS antenna than for the receiver with the ANN-MB antenna,implying that the TOPGNSS antenna is better than the ANN-MB antenna in terms of providing greater signal strengths.Summarily,the TOPGNSS antenna also performed better in minimizing the occurrence of cycle slips on phase TEC measurements.There are no conspicuous dif-ferences between the variances(computed as 5-min standard deviations)of phase TEC measurements for the two antennas,except for a period around May-June when the TOPGNSS gave a better perfor-mance in terms of minimizing the variances in phase TEC.Remarkably,the ANN-MB antenna gave a better performance than the TOPGNSS antenna in terms of minimizing the variances in pseudorange TEC for some satellite observations.For precise horizontal(North and East)positioning,the receiver with the TOPGNSS antenna gave better results,while the receiver with the ANN-MB antenna gave better vertical(Up)positioning.The errors for the receivers of both antennas are typically within about 5 m(the monthly mean was usually smaller than 1 m)in the horizontal direction and within about 10 m(the monthly mean was usually smaller than 4 m)in the vertical direction.

Daniel Okoh;Aderonke Obafaye;Oluwakemi Dare-Idowu;Babatunde Rabiu;Anton Kashcheyev;Claudio Cesaroni;John Bosco Habarulema;Bruno Nava

United Nations African Regional Centre for Space Science and Technology Education-English(UN-ARCSSTE-E),Obafemi Awolowo University Campus,Ile lfe,Nigeria||National Institute for Geophysics and Volcanology(INGV),00143 Rome,Italy||Institute for Space Science and Engineering,African University of Science and Technology,Abuja,NigeriaUnited Nations African Regional Centre for Space Science and Technology Education-English(UN-ARCSSTE-E),Obafemi Awolowo University Campus,Ile lfe,NigeriaUnited Nations African Regional Centre for Space Science and Technology Education-English(UN-ARCSSTE-E),Obafemi Awolowo University Campus,Ile lfe,Nigeria||Institute for Space Science and Engineering,African University of Science and Technology,Abuja,NigeriaUniversity of New Brunswick,Fredericton,CanadaNational Institute for Geophysics and Volcanology(INGV),00143 Rome,ItalySouth African National Space Agency(SANSA),P.O Box 32,Hermanus 7200,South Africa||Department of Physics and Electronics,Rhodes University,6140 Makhanda,South AfricaThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics,Strada Costiera,11,I-34151 Trieste,Italy

GNSSIonosphereLow-costAntennaTOPGNSSU-blox

《大地测量与地球动力学(英文版)》 2024 (003)

291-301 / 11

10.1016/j.geog.2023.11.002

评论