知识产权视域下非法获取商业大数据的刑法规制OA北大核心CHSSCDCSSCI
Criminal Regulation of Unauthorized Acquisition of Commercial Big Data from the Perspective of Intellectual Property Rights
大数据具有非竞争性、财产性、非独创性以及强垄断性等特征.实践中仅以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪规制非法获取商业大数据的行为,忽视了大数据的财产性.以侵犯商业秘密罪规制非法获取行为,则忽视了对已公开商业大数据的保护,也容易造成数据垄断.将商业大数据作为新型财产加以保护,则忽视了现有法律体系内可能存在的保护方案.大数据与知识产权在权利客体、权利限制以及制度目标上具有亲和性,因此可以用知识产权制度保护商业大数据.由于大数据不具有独创性,其难以成为汇编作品,但能够作为邻接权客体加以保护.因此可以在《著作权法》中规定大数据收集者的权利,并在侵犯著作权罪中增设侵犯大数据的行为类型,进而规制非法获取商业大数据的行为.
Big data has the characteristics of non-competition,property,non-originality and strong monopoly.In practice,the illegal acquisition of commercial big data is regulated only by the crime of illegally obtaining computer information system data,ignoring the property nature of big data.Regulating illegal acquisition with the crime of infringing trade secrets ignores the protection of disclosed commercial big data,and is also prone to data monopoly.Protecting commercial big data as a new type of property ignores the protection schemes that may exist within the existing legal system.Big data rights and intellectual property rights have an affinity in terms of right objects,rights restrictions and institutional objectives,so commercial big data can be protected with the intellectual property system.Since big data was not original,it was difficult to be a compilation work,but it could be protected as the subject matter of neighboring rights.Therefore,the rights of big data collectors can be stipulated in the Copyright Law,and the types of infringement of big data can be added to the crime of copyright infringement,so as to regulate the illegal acquisition of commercial big data.
左坚卫;彭赛嘉
北京师范大学法学院,北京 100875
政治法律
商业大数据知识产权邻接权非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪数据刑法
enterprise big dataintellectual propertyneighboring rightscrime of illegally obtaining computer information system datadata criminal law
《河北法学》 2024 (006)
59-74 / 16
本文系国家社科基金青年项目"行刑联动对积极刑法的合理调适与实践展开研究"(22CFX061)之研究成果.
评论