|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国药物经济学|维泊妥珠单抗联合RCHP用于治疗初诊弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本-效用

维泊妥珠单抗联合RCHP用于治疗初诊弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本-效用OA

Cost-utility of Polatuzumab Vedotin combination with RCHP for the Treatment of Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 评价维泊妥珠单抗联合利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星和泼尼松(PolaRCHP)用于治疗初诊弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的经济性.方法 从我国卫生体系角度出发,基于PLOARIX研究构建三状态的马尔可夫(Markov)模型,对PolaRCHP方案和利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(RCHOP)方案进行成本-效用分析,模型模拟时限为患者终生,循环周期为3 周,效用和成本均按5%的年贴现率进行贴现,测算总成本、健康获益和增量成本-效果比(ICER),并采用单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析考察模型的稳健性.结果 成本-效用分析结果显示,相比于RCHOP方案,PolaRCHP方案能使既往未经治疗的DLBCL患者增加2.70 QALYs,总成本增加210 134.00 元,ICER值为77 745.26 元/QALY,低于1 倍人均国内生产总值(GDP)的WTP阈值(85 698 元/QALY),说明PolaRCHP方案更具经济性.敏感性分析结果显示随着各变量在范围内波动,ICER值均小于3倍人均GDP.在1倍我国人均GDP的阈值下,PolaRCHP具有经济性的概率为96.45%.结论 以1 倍我国人均GDP为WTP阈值,从中国卫生服务体系出发,与RCHOP方案相比,PolaRCHP方案治疗既往未经治疗的DLBCL更具经济性.

Objective To evaluate the economics of polatuzumab vedotin combination with rituximab,cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin,and prednisone(PolaRCHP)in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL).Methods From the perspective of Chinese health system,a three-state Markov model was constructed based on the PLOARIX trail to analyze the cost-utility of PolaRCHP and rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide,Doxorubicin,vincristine and prednesone(RCHOP).The simulation time of the model is lifetime,the cycle is 3 weeks,and the utility and cost are discounted at an annual discount rate of 5%.Total cost,health benefit and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)were measured.And the robustness of the model was examined by single factor sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.Results Cost-utility analysis results showed that PolaRCHP resulted in an increase of 2.70 QALYs in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma compared to RCHOP.The total cost increased by 210 134.00 yuan,and the ICER was 77 745.26 yuan/QALY,which was lower than the WTP threshold of 1 times per capita GDP(85 698 yuan/QALY),indicating that the PolaRCHP scheme was more economical.The sensitivity analysis results show that as each variable fluctuates within the range,ICER is always smaller than 3 times per capita GDP.Under the threshold of 1 times China's per capita GDP,the probability of PolaRCHP being economical is 96.45%.Conclusion Under the WTP threshold of 1 times China's per capita GDP,compared with RCHOP,PolaRCHP is more economical for the treatment of previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Chinese health system.

梁锦莹;张炜晨;余美辰;程国华

暨南大学药学院,广州 511436

临床医学

弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤维泊妥珠单抗药物经济学成本-效用分析

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomaPolatuzumab vedotinPharmacoeconomicsCost-utility

《中国药物经济学》 2024 (004)

17-23 / 7

10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2024.04.003

评论