|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|石油与天然气化工|空气驱油可燃气体爆炸安全风险分析

空气驱油可燃气体爆炸安全风险分析OA北大核心

Safety risk analysis of air flooding oil combustible gas explosion

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 目前,安全问题仍然是限制空气驱大规模应用的主要原因,为此进行了针对其爆炸极限计算方法的研究.方法 通过对6种可燃气体的单组分计算方法、单组分文献值与2种多组分计算方法进行组合,得到了 14种计算组合,将其与国内某油田3 口井的爆炸实测值进行比较,以判断哪种组合适应性最好.结果 含碳原子单组分燃气计算法与多组分燃气计算中查图-理·查特里修正法组合得到的计算结果整体误差相对较小,更符合爆炸极限实测值.结论 可为C1~C3轻烃体积分数达90%以上的井流物的爆炸极限理论计算方法的选择提供参考.

Objective At present,the safety issue is still the primary reason limiting the large-scale application of air flooding.Therefore,the calculation method of the explosion limit of air flooding was used in this study.Methods Through the combination of the component calculation method of six kinds of combustible gases,literature value of single component gases and two kinds of multi-component calculation method,fourteen kinds of calculation combinations have been obtained.The calculation results of various combinations have been subsequently compared with the explosion-measured values of three wells in a domestic oilfield to determine which combination has the best adaptability.Results The overall error of the calculation results obtained by combining the carbon atom single component method and checking the figure-Le Chatlier method was relatively good,which was more consistent with the measured value of explosion limit.Conclusion This study provides a reference for selecting theoretical calculation methods for the well fluid gas explosion limit with the volume fraction of Ci-C3 light hydrocarbon content of more than 90%.

曾文广;葛鹏莉;肖雯雯;刘青山;闻小虎;史宝成;胡姿铭

中国石油化工股份有限公司西北油田分公司||中国石油化工集团公司碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏提高采收率重点实验室长江大学石油工程学院

空气驱可燃气体爆炸安全风险惰性气体

air floodingcombustible gasexplosionsafety riskinert gas

《石油与天然气化工》 2024 (003)

130-133,140 / 5

国家自然科学基金面上项目(51974033);油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室开放基金(PLN2023-11);吉林省智慧管道与流体力学重点实验室开放基金(IPFM2022-04)

10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2024.03.020

评论