|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|实用肝脏病杂志|TAF治疗ETV经治的低病毒血症慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效研究

TAF治疗ETV经治的低病毒血症慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效研究OACSTPCD

Virological response to tenofovir alafenamide in patients with low-level viremia chronic hepatitis B after entecavir treatment

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 观察应用丙酚替诺福韦(TAF)继续治疗经恩替卡韦(ETV)治疗的低病毒血症(LLV)的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的疗效.方法 2018 年1 月~2022 年12 月我院收治的CHB患者 101 例,纳入患者均接受ETV治疗至少48 周,经检测符合LLV定义标准,被随机分为两组,其中50 例继续应用ETV治疗48 周,另51 例换用TAF治疗48 周.常规检测血清肌酐(sCr)、β2 微球蛋白(β2-MG)和估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR),完全病毒学应答率(CVR)定义为血清HBV DNA载量<20 IU/mL.使用瞬时弹性成像探测仪行肝脏硬度检测(LSM).结果 在治疗 48 周末,TAF治疗组CVR为98.0%,显著高于ETV治疗组的24.0%(P<0.05),而两组血清HBeAg转阴率(17.7%对 4.0%,P>0.05)和ALT复常率(96.1%对98.0,P>0.05)无显著性差异;TAF治疗组血清ALT、AST水平和LSM分别为(37.7±5.3)U/L、(34.8±5.7)U/L和(7.1±1.0)kPa,与ETV治疗组[分别为(36.2±4.8)U/L、(35.2±5.3)U/L和(7.8±1.1)kPa,P>0.05]比,无显著性差异;TAF组sCr和血清β2-MG水平分别为(70.4±6.5)μmol/L和(1.3±0.3)mg/L,显著低于ETV治疗组[分别为(78.5±6.9)μmol/L和(1.6±0.2)mg/L,P<0.05],而eGFR为(105.9±17.3)mL/min/1.73 m2,显著高于ETV治疗组[(98.0±16.7)mL/min/1.73 m2,P<0.05].结论 对于ETV经治后出现LLV的CHB患者转换为TAF继续治疗可提高病毒学应答率,安全性高,值得继续扩大验证.

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the antiviral efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)in the re-treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB)and low-level viremia(LLV)after entecavir(ETV)treatment.Methods 101 patients with CHB were recruited in our hospital between January 2018 and December 2022,and the enrollment included ETV-treated for longer than 48 weeks and LLV was confirmed by serum HBV DNA load detection.50 patients toke oral ETV continuously for 48 weeks,and other 51 patients switched to TAF re-treatment for 48 weeks.Serum creatinine(sCr),β2 microglobulin(β2-G)levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)were routinely detected,and the liver stiffness measurement(LSM)was measured by transient elastography.The complete virological response(CVR)was defined as serum HBV DNA negative,and less than 20 IU/mL quantitatively.Results At the end of 48 weeks,the CVR in the TAF-treated patients was 98.0%,much higher than 24.0%(P<0.05)in ETV-treated patients,while there were no significant differences as respect to serum HBeAg negative rates(17.7%vs.4.0%,P>0.05)and serum ALT normalization rates(96.1%vs.98.0,P>0.05)in two groups;serum ALT,AST levels and the LSM in patients receiving TAF were(37.7±5.3)U/L,(34.8±5.7)U/L and(7.1±1.0)kPa,all not significantly different compared to[(36.2±4.8)U/L,(35.2±5.3)U/L and(7.8±1.1)kPa,respectively,P>0.05]in patients taking ETV;serum Cr and β2-MG levels were(70.4±6.5)μmol/L and(1.3±0.3)mg/L,both significantly lower than[(78.5±6.9)μmol/L and(1.6±0.2)mg/L,P<0.05],while the eGFR was(105.9±17.3)mL/min/1.73 m2,much higher than[(98.0±16.7)mL/min/1.73 m2,P<0.05]in ETV-treated patients.Conclusion We recommend the CHB patients with LLV after ETV treatment switch to TAF therapy,which could elevate virological response rate,and warrants further clinical investigation.

薛李娜;诸国兵;吴琳霖;杨小星

226400 江苏省南通市 南通大学附属如东医院感染性疾病科

慢性乙型肝炎恩替卡韦经治低病毒血症丙酚替诺福韦完全病毒学应答治疗

Hepatitis BEntecavirLow-level viremiaTenofovir alafenamideRe-treatmentComplete virological response

《实用肝脏病杂志》 2024 (004)

519-522 / 4

南通市传染病防治联盟科技基金资助项目(编号:202308006)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2024.04.007

评论