基于博弈论组合赋权-TOPSIS模型的建筑企业绿色转型评价研究OACHSSCDCSTPCD
Research on the Evaluation of Green Transformation of Construction Enterprises Based on Game Theory Combinatorial Weighting-TOPSIS Model
建筑业绿色转型是实现"双碳"战略的重要举措,明晰建筑企业绿色转型发展水平状况对于推动建筑业可持续发展具有重要意义.本文以建筑企业为研究对象,在界定建筑企业绿色转型内涵的基础上,从绿色投入、产出、管理、创新、形象以及战略规划等六个维度构建建筑企业绿色转型评价指标体系;采用博弈论组合赋权与TOPSIS评价模型对建筑企业绿色转型水平进行排序评价,并对结果进行分析.结果表明,我国建筑上市企业绿色转型效果不显著;企业间绿色意识不统一,绿色转化与创新能力不足;各细分行业间转型差异化明显;区域间发展不协调,总体呈东高西低的空间格局.基于此,从企业、行业和区域层面分别提出促进建筑企业绿色转型的建议,为建筑企业绿色转型提供决策参考和理论支持.
The green transformation of the construction industry is an important measure to achieve the"carbon dioxide emission and carbon neutrality"strategy,and it is of great significance to clarify the level of green transformation of construction enterprises to promote the sustainable development of the construction industry.Based on defining the connotation of green transformation of construction enter-prises,this paper constructed an evaluation index system for green transformation of construction en-terprises from six dimensions:green input,output,management,innovation,image and strategic planning.Game theory combination weighting and TOPSIS evaluation model were used to rank and e-valuate the green transformation level of construction enterprises,and the results were analyzed.The results show that the effect of green transformation of China's listed construction enterprises is not sig-nificant.The green awareness is not unified among enterprises,and the green transformation and inno-vation capabilities are insufficient.The transformation of various sub-sectors is significantly differentia-ted.The development of regions is uncoordinated,and the spatial pattern of eastern,high,and west-ern regions is generally present.Based on that,suggestions and strategies to promote the green trans-formation of construction enterprises are put forward from the enterprise,industry and regional levels.
陈群;谢梦宇;陈哲
福建理工大学 管理学院,福建 福州 350118||宁德职业技术学院,福建 宁德 355099福建理工大学 管理学院,福建 福州 350118
土木建筑
建筑企业绿色转型评价体系评价模型
construction enterprisegreen transformationevaluation systemevaluation model
《土木工程与管理学报》 2024 (003)
64-71,79 / 9
福建省科技重大专项(2019HZ07011-3);福建理工大学科研启动基金(GY-S19013)
评论