|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|网络安全与数据治理|涉数据法律规范的冲突解决

涉数据法律规范的冲突解决OA

Conflict resolution of data-related legal norms:form and substance dichotomy

中文摘要英文摘要

目前涉数据法律规范在适用中存在冲突,冲突解决不当导致法律责任归结失衡.判断涉数据法律规范冲突的本质,可将其分为法益侵害单一性的形式冲突和法益侵害多重性的实质冲突.涉数据法律规范冲突解决的前提是:明确《数据安全法》《个人信息保护法》及《网络安全法》保护法益所指涉对象的不同及关联性;厘清法律规范间的关系轮廓.涉数据法律规范的冲突解决方式需要类型化区分形式冲突及实质冲突,形式冲突类比于《刑法》中法条竞合,遵循"特别优先";实质冲突类比于《刑法》中想象竞合和并罚竞合,遵循"择一重罪处罚"或"并罚".正确解决涉数据法律规范冲突不仅实现恰当评价涉数据违法行为的目标,也是提升数据生产力的内在要求.

At present,there are conflicts in the application of data-related legal norms,and improper resolution of the conflicts leads to the imbalance of legal liability attribution.To judge the nature of the conflict of legal norms related to data,it can be di-vided into the form conflict of single infringement of legal interests and the substantive conflict of multiple infringement of legal in-terests.The premise of resolving the conflict of data-related legal norms is to clarify the differences and relevance of the objects involved in the data security law,the personal information protection law and the network security law;Clarify the outline of the relationship between legal norms.The conflict resolution of data-related legal norms needs to be classified into formal conflict and substantive conflict,which is analogous to the concurrence of articles in criminal law and follows the principle of special priority;Substantive conflict is analogous to imaginative concurrence and concurrent punishment concurrence in criminal law,which follows the principle of choosing one heavy or concurrent punishment.Correctly resolving the conflict of data-related legal norms not only a-chieves the goal of properly evaluating data-related illegal acts,but also is the inherent requirement of improving data productivity.

柴雪映

山东大学 法学院,山东 青岛 266200

政治法律

法律规范冲突法益实质冲突数据竞合

conflict of legal normslegal interestsubstantive conflictdatacoopetition

《网络安全与数据治理》 2024 (007)

77-86 / 10

10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.07.012

评论