基于长期氮肥示踪试验评估氮肥利用率算法的合理性OA北大核心CSTPCD
Evaluation of the rationality of nitrogen use efficiency approaches based on long-term fate of nitrogen fertilizer tracing experiments
氮肥利用率是衡量氮肥被作物利用的一个指标,常规采用的计算方法为差减法和15N示踪法,主要是通过作物吸收的氮量来计算氮肥利用率.由于这两种方法没有考虑氮肥在土壤中的残留和后效,显著低估了施用氮肥的实际效应.为此,国内外研究者一直在探索更实际的氮肥利用率计算法.不同的改进方法以不同的表现形式包含了氮肥的遗留效应,弥补了差减法和15N示踪法在短期试验中对实际氮肥利用率的严重低估,基本接近于实际氮肥利用率,但远高于常规差减法或15N示踪法估算值.在本文中定义的实际氮肥利用率(ANUE)为:在土壤残留示踪氮被完全消耗的条件下,作物地上部吸收肥料氮占施氮量的百分比.法国 28 年旱地作物的氮肥叠加利用率为 61.3%~65.3%,中国太湖地区 17 年的水旱轮作体系示踪氮肥试验中氮肥叠加利用率为 38.6%~43.0%.本研究采用Origin 2021 的图形数字化工具,获取这两个长期定位试验数据,包括每季作物吸收15N、土壤残留15N数据,分别以耗竭耕层(0-20 cm)、1 m、2 m土体中的氮素残留量来计算氮肥利用率.以此为参照标准,评估土壤氮素平衡法和氮肥有效率法计算结果的合理性.基于 2m土体残留肥料氮的土壤氮素平衡法和氮肥有效率法,会高估旱地作物的氮肥利用率;而以耕层土壤残留肥料氮作为估计参数时,则与旱地实际氮肥利用率基本一致(61%~74%);而氮肥有效率(41%~52%)可以很好地估算我国太湖地区水旱轮作体系的实际氮肥利用率.因此,跨地块或作物系统的氮肥利用率比较,应选择适当的计算方法,以避免由不同方法导致的不可比性而产生误解.氮肥有效率法(将作物吸收和土壤残留氮均视为有效部分)可以通过短期试验获得接近实际的氮肥利用率,具有广泛的应用价值.
Nitrogen use efficiency(NUE)is a key indicator for evaluating the crop uptake of nitrogen(N)fertilizer applied to cropland.The principal approaches for quantifying NUE include N difference and 15 N tracer.However,these approaches significantly underestimated the actual efficiency of N fertilizer,as these approaches failed to consider the residual and legacy effects of N fertilizer in soil.Therefore,researchers all over the world have been investigating the more actual NUE.The NUE calculated by improvement methods is analogous to the actual NUE,but higher than the N difference or the 15 N tracer approaches.This can be attributed to the differing forms in which various improvement methods incorporate the legacy effects of N fertilizer,thereby compensating for the underestimation of NUE using the N difference or the 15 N tracer approaches in short-term experiments.In this review,the actual NUE is defined as the percentage of N fertilizer uptake by the crop aboveground to the amount of N fertilizer inputs,while completely consuming the residual N fertilizer in soil.The accumulative N recovery efficiency is 61.3%-65.3%of a 28-year upland cropping system in France,and 38.6%-43.0%of a 17-year paddy-upland rotation system in the Taihu Lake region of China.We obtained the data from the two long-term field experiments using the Digitizer tool of Origin 2021,including the crop 15 N uptake and the residual 15 N in soil.The NUE was calculated based on the N residual in the topsoil(0-20 cm),1 m,and 2 m soil,respectively.We analyzed and evaluated the rationality of the computed results of the soil N balance and N fertilizer efficiency approaches by comparing them to the actual NUE.The soil N balance and N fertilizer efficiency approaches significantly overestimated NUE when calculated by two meters of residual N in the soil.The surface(0-20 cm)soil residual N was found as a calculation parameter for estimating the actual NUE in these two approaches(61%-74%).However,the N fertilizer efficiency(41%-52%)was the only approach that accurately estimated the actual NUE in the Taihu Lake region of China.Therefore,the comparison of NUE across plots or crop systems should be based on a consistently chosen quantification approach to avoid inherent biases introduced by different approaches.In general,the N fertilizer efficiency approach(both crop absorption and soil residual nitrogen are considered to be utilized)achieves near the actual NUE in short-term experiments,demonstrating extensive application value.
巨晓棠;田雪;冀宏杰;田昌玉
海南大学热带农林学院,海南海口 570228中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081
氮肥利用率差减法15N示踪法土壤氮素平衡法氮肥有效率
nitrogen use efficiencynitrogen difference method15N tracer methodsoil nitrogen balance methodnitrogen fertilizer efficiency
《植物营养与肥料学报》 2024 (007)
1284-1294 / 11
海南省重大科技计划项目(ZDKJ2021008);海南大学科研启动基金项目[KYQD(ZR)-20098].
评论