|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|天津农业科学|清远烟区不同烤烟品种引进与综合质量评价

清远烟区不同烤烟品种引进与综合质量评价OA

Introduction and Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Different Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Qingyuan

中文摘要英文摘要

为筛选出适宜清远烟区种植的烤烟品种,以当地主栽品种粤烟97为对照,分析和比较NX212、中川208、湘烟7号、粤烟1号、中烟特香301、翠碧1号、云烟116共7个外引烤烟品种成熟期的发病率、农艺性状、单叶质量、烤后经济性状、化学成分、感官质量和外观质量,并通过模糊评价法对不同烤烟品种进行综合质量评价.结果表明:云烟116的化学成分协调性较好,抗病性优于粤烟97,外观质量和感官质量表现较为突出,虽然其产量和有效叶数不突出,但产值优于粤烟97,其上等烟比例和均价居第1,综合表现优秀;其次是粤烟1号,其化学成分较为协调,外观质量、产量、产值均较高,其上等烟率较粤烟97提升明显,感官质量表现与粤烟97相当.综合来看,云烟116和粤烟1号较对照粤烟97综合质量表现突出,可以作为清远烟区后备烤烟品种.

In order to identify suitable flue-cured tobacco varieties for cultivation in the Qingyuan tobacco growing area,a study was conducted using the local variety Yueyan 97 as the control.Seven introduced flue-cured tobacco varieties,namely NX212,Nakagawa 208,Xiangyan 7,Yueyan 1,Zhongyan Texiang 301,Cuibi 1,and Yunyan 116 were analyzed and compared in terms of disease inci-dence,agronomic traits,single leaf weight,economic traits,chemical composition,sensory quality,and appearance quality at maturity.The quality of these varieties was evaluated using a fuzzy evaluation method.The results indicated that Yunyan 116 exhibited well-coordinated chemical components,better disease resistance than Yueyan 97,and superior appearance and sensory quality.While the yield and effective leaf number of Yunyan 116 were not outstanding,its yield value was better than that of Yueyan 97,ranking first in premium tobacco proportion and average price,showcasing excellent overall performance.Following closely was Yueyan 1,which dis-played harmonious chemical composition,higher appearance quality,yield,and output value.Its high-grade tobacco rate significantly surpassed that of Yueyan 97,with sensory quality performance equivalent to Yueyan 97.In conclusion,Yunyan 116 and Yueyan 1 outperforme Yueyan 97,making them viable backup flue-cured tobacco varieties for the Qingyuan tobacco growing area.

李红星;陈俊;黄凯祥;杨天乐;吴向;王维

广东烟草清远市有限公司,广东清远 511515广东中烟工业有限责任公司,广东广州 510610华南农业大学农学院,广东广州 510630

农业科学

清远烤烟品种综合评价

Qingyuanflue-cured tobaccovarietycomprehensive evaluation

《天津农业科学》 2024 (007)

33-38 / 6

广东烟草清远市有限公司科技计划资助项目(清烟科项202203);广东中烟工业有限责任公司科技计划资助项目(2023440000240044)

10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2024.07.006

评论