制冷学报2024，Vol.45Issue(4)：1-13,13.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4339.2024.04.001
新PFASs限制法案提案下汽车空调替代制冷剂的对比与展望
Comparison and Prospect of Alternative Refrigerants for MAC Based on New PFASs Restriction Regulation Proposal
摘要
Abstract
With the adoption and implementation of the Kigali Amendment in China,the R134a refrigerant has gradually reduced and could be eliminated in China's mobile air conditioning(MAC).Currently,the most important alternative refrigerants for MAC are R1234yf,CO2,and R290;however,China has no criteria for the selection of these three refrigerants.Recently,Germany and five other countries have proposed regulations to restrict PFASs,and R1234yf has also been included in the restricted list;therefore,the prospect of R1234yf is not optimistic.In this context,this study compares R1234yf,CO2,and R290 in terms of environmental protection,safety,economy,and system performance.Relevant research results and conclusions are summarized,and the latest PF AS substance restriction proposal involving MAC was organized and analyzed.These efforts provide direction for the research of alternative refrigerants in the field of MAC in China,which may be used as a basis for the selection of alternative refrigerants for MAC in the future.关键词
汽车空调/替代制冷剂/CO2/R1234yf/R290Key words
automotive air conditioning/alternative refrigerants/CO2/R1234yf/R290分类
通用工业技术引用本文复制引用
任兆龙,管燕,殷翔,宋昱龙,曹锋..新PFASs限制法案提案下汽车空调替代制冷剂的对比与展望[J].制冷学报,2024,45(4):1-13,13.基金项目
国家重点研发计划(2022YFE0208000)资助项目.(The pro-ject was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(No.2022YFE0208000).) （2022YFE0208000）
