|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|食品科学|基于主成分及聚类分析的东北南部地区优质粳稻品质的综合评价

基于主成分及聚类分析的东北南部地区优质粳稻品质的综合评价OA北大核心CSTPCD

Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of High-Quality Japonica Rice Varieties in Southern Regions of Northeast China Using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

中文摘要英文摘要

为探究不同水稻品种综合品质指标之间的差异,采用主成分分析和隶属函数分析法对46 个东北南部地区优质粳稻的13 个稻米品质指标进行检测分析和综合性评价,并利用聚类分析法将其进行归类.结果表明:不同水稻品种间各个品质指标均存在较大差异,其中垩白粒率变异系数最大,为66.32%,直链淀粉含量变异系数最小,为3.28%;相关性分析结果表明所测定的13 个品质指标之间均有不同程度的相关性.通过主成分分析确定出4 个主成分综合评判不同水稻品种的稻米品质.主成分1主要综合了外观、硬度、黏度、平衡度和食味评分;主成分2主要综合了糙米率、精米率和整精米率;主成分3主要综合了垩白粒率和垩白度;主成分4主要综合了长宽比、直链淀粉含量和蛋白质含量.利用隶属函数法评价出46 个水稻品种品质的优劣顺序,综合得分排名前10的水稻品种分别是辽粳1925、盐粳935、铁粳香3号、沈农625、辽粳1499、辽粳香1号、盐粳241、辽粳419、铁粳11、盐粳313,并通过聚类分析将其划分为5大类.其中,Ⅰ类材料包括1 个品种,占供试材料总数的2.17%,其稻米品质最优;Ⅱ类材料包括18个品种,占供试材料总数的39.13%,其稻米品质较为优质;Ⅲ类材料有18个品种,占供试材料总数的39.13%,其稻米品质中等;Ⅳ类材料有7个品种,占供试材料总数的15.22%,其稻米品质相对较差;Ⅴ类材料包括2个品种,占供试材料总数的4.35%,其稻米品质最差.本研究结果可为筛选优质水稻品种提供参考.

In order to explore the differences in the quality indexes of different rice varieties,this study used principal component analysis(PCA)and membership function analysis(MFA)for comprehensive evaluation of 13 quality indexes of 46 high-quality japonica rice varieties in southern regions of Northeast China,and classified the rice varieties by cluster analysis(CA).The results showed that there were significant differences in all quality indexes among different rice varieties.Among the quality indexes,the coefficient of variation for grain chalkiness rate was the largest(66.32%),while that for amylose content was the smallest(3.28%).Correlation analysis showed that there were different degrees of correlation among the 13 quality indexes.Through PCA,four principal components(PCs)were determined to comprehensively evaluate the quality of different rice varieties.PC1 was synthesized from appearance,hardness,viscosity,balance degree and taste score,PC2 from the percentage of brown rice,milled rice and whole milled rice,PC3 from grain chalkiness rate and chalkiness degree,and PC4 from length-to-width ratio,amylose content and protein content.The quality of the 46 rice varieties was evaluated and ranked by MFA.The top 10 varieties were Liaogeng 1925,Yangeng 935,Tiegengxiang 3,Shennong 625,Liaogeng 1499,Liaogengxiang 1,Yangeng 241,Liaogeng 419,Tiegeng 11 and Yangeng 313.The 46 varieties were classified into five categories by CA.Class Ⅰ included one variety(2.17%),whose quality was the best.Class Ⅱ included 18 varieties(39.13%),and their rice quality was excellent.Class Ⅲ included 18 varieties(39.13%),and their rice quality was moderate.Class Ⅳ included 7 varieties,and their rice quality was poor.Class Ⅴ included two varieties(4.35%),and their rice quality was the worst.This conclusion can provide an important reference for screening high quality rice varieties.

冯莹莹;董立强;马亮;韩勇;李建国;杨铁鑫

辽宁省水稻研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110101

农业科学

水稻主成分分析隶属函数品质综合评价聚类分析

riceprincipal component analysismembership functioncomprehensive quality evaluationcluster analysis

《食品科学》 2024 (018)

17-24 / 8

辽宁省应用基础研究计划项目(2022JH2/101300283);辽宁省农业科学院院长基金项目(2023BS0806);辽宁省农业科学院院长基金青年基金项目(2022QN2302)

10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20231017-133

评论