|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|腹腔镜外科杂志|达芬奇机器人在胰腺手术中的应用

达芬奇机器人在胰腺手术中的应用OACSTPCD

Application of the da Vinci robot in pancreatic surgery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:分析达芬奇机器人在胰腺微创手术中的安全性与可行性.方法:回顾分析 2019 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月接受达芬奇机器人胰腺手术的42 例患者的临床资料,并与同期149 例腹腔镜胰腺手术进行对比.机器人组中10 例行胰十二指肠切除术,24 例行胰体尾切除术,5 例行胰腺肿瘤局部切除术,3 例行胰腺中段切除术;腹腔镜组中98 例行胰十二指肠切除术,31 例行胰体尾切除术,2 例行胰腺肿瘤局部切除术,18 例行胰腺中段切除术.结果:胰十二指肠切除术中,机器人组手术时间长于腹腔镜组[(383.2±69.6)min vs.(307.1±73.2)min,P<0.05],术后排气时间短于腹腔镜组[(3.1±0.7)d vs.(4.0±1.0)d,P<0.05];两组B+C级胰瘘(0 vs.10.2%)、术后出血(10.0%vs.4.1%)、术后淋巴瘘(10.0%vs.5.1%)、腹腔感染(0 vs.5.1%)、肺部感染(0 vs.4.1%)发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).胰体尾切除术中,机器人组术中出血量少于腹腔镜组[(106.7±59.6)mL vs.(168.1±90.9)mL,P<0.05],术后排气时间短于腹腔镜组[(3.5±0.9)d vs.(4.7±1.3)d,P<0.05];两组B+C级胰瘘(8.3%vs.9.7%)、腹腔感染(4.2%vs.9.7%)、切口感染(4.2%vs.0)发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).良性或交界性肿瘤手术中,机器人组保脾率高于腹腔镜组(65.0%vs.34.6%,P=0.041).结论:机器人胰腺手术是安全、可行的,并发症发生率与腹腔镜手术相当,在胰体尾手术保脾率、术后首次排气时间方面具有一定优势.

Objective:To analyze the safety and feasibility of da Vinci robot in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.Methods:The clinical data of 42 patients who underwent da Vinci robotic pancreatic surgery from Dec.2019 to Dec.2022 were retro-spectively analyzed and compared with 149 laparoscopic pancreatic minimally invasive surgeries in the same period.In the robotic group,there were 10 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy,24 cases of distal pancreatectomy,5 cases of local resection of pancreatic tumor,and 3 cases of mid-pancreatic resection;in the laparoscopic group,there were 98 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy,31 cases of distal pancreatectomy,2 cases of local resection of pancreatic tumor,and 18 cases of mid-pancreatic resection.Results:In pancreati-coduodenectomy,the operation time in the robotic group was longer than that in the laparoscopic group[(383.2±69.6)min vs.(307.1±73.2)min,P<0.05];and the postoperative exhaust time was shorter than that in the laparoscopic group[(3.1±0.7)d vs.(4.0±1.0)d,P<0.05];in the two groups,B+C grade pancreatic fistula(0 vs.10.2%),postoperative hemorrhage(10.0%vs.4.1%),postopera-tivelymphaticfistula(10.0%vs.5.1%),abdominal infection(0 vs.5.1%),and pulmonary infection(0 vs.4.1%)incidences were not statistically significantly different(P>0.05).In distal pancreatectomy,intraoperative blood loss in the robotic group was less than that in the laparoscopic group[(106.7±59.6)mL vs.(168.1±90.9)mL,P<0.05],and postoperative exhaust time was shorter than that in the laparoscopic group[(3.5±0.9)d vs.(4.7±1.3)d,P<0.05].The differences in the incidence of grade B+C pancre-atic fistula(8.3%vs.9.7%),abdominal infection(4.2%vs.9.7%),and incision infection(4.2%vs.0)were not statistically significant(P>0.05).In benign or borderline tumor surgery,the spleen preservation rate was higher in the robotic group than that in the laparoscopic group(65.0%vs.34.6%,P=0.041).Conclusions:Robotic pancreatic surgery is safe and feasible,with a complica-tion rate comparable to laparoscopic pancreatic surgery,and has certain advantages in spleen preservation rate of distal pancreatectomy and the first postoperative exhaust time.

崔鑫涛;王骥;马红钦;刘利;杜羽升;赵文星

徐州医科大学附属医院普通外科,江苏 徐州,221000

临床医学

胰腺肿瘤胰体尾切除术胰十二指肠切除术机器人手术

Pancreatic neoplasmsDistal pancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic surgical procedures

《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2024 (008)

594-601,606 / 9

10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2024.08.594

评论