泄露型内幕交易共同违法的认定标准与处断规则OA北大核心CHSSCDCSSCICSTPCD
实践中,针对泄露型内幕交易的行政执法存在对泄密人处罚的选择性缺失和对泄密人与受密人共同违法认定标准过于严格的问题.这并非证券执法机关主动选择的结果,而是客观上存在因果关系难以认定的困难.鉴于分割审视单纯泄密行为与受密后交易行为不利于全面打击泄露型内幕交易,构建一套严谨、合理的泄露型内幕交易共同违法认定标准与处断规则十分必要.本文借鉴刑法的三阶层体系,在分析泄露型内幕交易共同违法"构成要件该当性""违法性"和"有责性"三个要素的基础上,认为:在认定环节,应采用"行为共同标准",将泄密人与受密人的行为作为一个整体进行审视,初步判断是否符合内幕交易的认定条件,进而分析二者行为的结合是否对同时反向交易方的利益造成了损害.在处断环节,应根据"责任主义"原则,分别评估泄密人和受密人的主观意图并进行归责和处罚.
In practice,the administrative enforcement against leak-based insider trading involves several issues including the selective absence of penalties for the leaker and overly strict standards for identifying joint violations by the leaker and the recipient.This is not due to a deliberate choice by the securities enforcement agency but rather the objective difficulty in establishing a causal relationship.Considering that separately examining the mere act of leaking information and the subsequent trading behavior does not facilitate a comprehensive crackdown on leak-based insider trading,it is essential to establish a rigorous and reasonable set of identification standards and adjudication rules for joint violations in leak-based insider trading.By drawing on the three-tier system of criminal law,this paper analyzes the three elements of"constitutive element appropriateness,""illegality,"and"culpability"in the joint violation of leak-based insider trading.The paper states that in the determination phase,a"behavioral joint standard"should be adopted to examine the actions of the leaker and the recipient as a whole.This action initially assesses whether the conditions for insider trading are met and further analyzes whether the combined actions of the leaker and the recipient have harmed the interests of the contemporaneous trading counterparty.In the adjudication phase,the principle of"responsibility doctrine"should be applied separately to evaluate the subjective intent of both the leaker and the recipient,and to assign accountability and impose penalties accordingly.
赵吟
西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆 401120
政治法律
泄露型内幕交易共同违法责任主义行政处罚
leak-based insider tradingjoint violationresponsibility doctrineadministrative penalty
《证券市场导报》 2024 (010)
15-26 / 12
重庆市教委人文社科规划项目"企业破产预重整制度研究"(项目编号:22SKGH029)
评论