高考数学逻辑思维能力测评工具的实证研究OA北大核心CSSCICSTPCD
An Empirical Study on the Assessment Tools of Logical Thinking Ability of Mathematics Test in College Entrance Examination
以教育实证为研究范式,以质性与量化混合运用为研究方法,探索高考数学逻辑思维能力测评工具.首先,采用定性文本分析,构建了由 3 项一级指标和 9 项二级指标构成的高考数学逻辑思维能力发展水平的测评指标体系;其次,基于测评指标体系,编制了测试卷,检验、修正了测评指标体系;最后,借助德尔菲法、问卷信效度检测与验证性因子分析方法,基于测评指标体系,构建了高考数学逻辑思维能力发展水平的测评模型:L=0.32L1+0.33L2+0.35L3.实践表明,所构建的测评指标体系与测评模型科学、合理、可操作,能够作为高考数学逻辑思维能力的测评工具.
Based on the empirical research paradigm of education,using the mixed method of qualitative and quantitative research,this paper explores the assessment tools of logical thinking ability of mathematics test in college entrance examination.Firstly,using qualitative text analysis constructs the evaluation index system of the development level of logical thinking ability of mathematics test in college entrance examination,which consists of 3 first-level evaluation indexes and 9 second-level evaluation indexes.Secondly,with the help of quantitative evaluation of college entrance examination mathematics questions,based on evaluation indexes is compiled to verify the evaluation index system.Finally,using Delphi method,questionnaire reliability and validity detection and confirmatory factor analysis method,based on the evaluation index system,the evaluation model of the development level of logical thinking ability of mathematics test in college entrance examination is constructed:L=0.32L1+0.33L2+0.35L3.The preliminary test shows that the evaluation index system and evaluation model constructed are scientific,reasonable,and operable,and can be used as an evaluation tool for logical thinking ability of mathematics test in college entrance examination.
陈伟安;柯跃海
福建师范大学 数学与统计学院,福建 福州 350117||福建省石狮市第一中学,福建 泉州 362700福建师范大学 数学与统计学院,福建 福州 350117
教育学
高考数学逻辑思维能力测评工具实证研究
mathematics of college entrance examinationlogical thinking abilityassessment toolsempirical research
《数学教育学报》 2024 (005)
42-53 / 12
教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目——高中生数学核心素养的评价与培养研究(17YJA880049);2019 年福建省本科高校教育教学改革研究项目——创建"三位一体培养平台"提升数学师范生教学实践能力(FBJG20190157)
评论