| 注册
首页|期刊导航|食品科学|食品小业态处罚裁量问题研究——以"芹菜案"展开

食品小业态处罚裁量问题研究——以"芹菜案"展开

肖平辉 王佳阳

食品科学2026,Vol.47Issue(4):17-26,10.
食品科学2026,Vol.47Issue(4):17-26,10.DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251015-084

食品小业态处罚裁量问题研究——以"芹菜案"展开

Discretionary Penalties in Small Food Businesses:An Analysis Based on the"Celery Case"

肖平辉 1王佳阳2

作者信息

  • 1. 广州大学法学院,广东 广州 510006
  • 2. 汉堡大学法与经济学研究所,德国 汉堡 20354
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

The exposure of the"Celery Case"in Shaanxi has sparked public scrutiny over administrative rationality,revealing a disconnect between legitimacy and reasonableness within the intersecting domains of food safety and small business regulation.The case highlights two fundamental contradictions:the disparity between the value of goods involved and the severity of penalties,and the tension between punitive sanctions and the principle of restraint.The root causes lie in the inherent characteristics of small food businesses and overriding legal provisions that amplify monetary discrepancies.The mechanical application of administrative penalties and courts'deferential stance based on the professionalism of administrative agencies render discretionary power in administrative sanctions impracticable.By re-examining the standard of"proportionality"using the principle of proportionality and credit-based regulatory measures,improving transparency in automated decision-making mechanisms,and permitting appropriate appeals and deviations by law enforcement officers,we can redesign the discretionary framework to enhance administrative rationality.

关键词

食品小业态/行政处罚/行政裁量/裁量机制

Key words

small food businesses/administrative penalty/penalty discretion/discretion mechanism

分类

社会科学

引用本文复制引用

肖平辉,王佳阳..食品小业态处罚裁量问题研究——以"芹菜案"展开[J].食品科学,2026,47(4):17-26,10.

基金项目

国家社会科学基金面上项目(19BFX164) (19BFX164)

食品科学

1002-6630

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文