|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|教师教育研究|"好导师"怎么评?

"好导师"怎么评?OA北大核心CSSCICSTPCD

How to Select"Good Mentor"?

中文摘要英文摘要

基于我国"双一流"高校"好导师"评选方案的文本分析发现,各校"好导师"评选制度总体呈现如下特点:在推荐环节上强调以他荐为主,多种推荐途径并存;在评审主体上强调多元参与,以在读研究生为主;在评选标准上重视导师自身素养,相对忽视导生交互质量;在评选方法上强调依托质性材料进行投票或打分;在激励环节上强调多种激励类型,重在肯定导师已有成就.各校的评选制度总体上对导师以育人为本的职业价值有所忽视,渗透着以量化评分为主的工具主义价值取向,尚缺乏对导师专业发展的人本主义价值关怀.建议各校优化"好导师"的相关评选制度,以进一步发挥其在导师队伍建设中的引领作用.

Based on the text analysis of the selection scheme of"good mentor"in China's"double first-class"construction universities,it is found that the selection system of"good mentor"in various universities presents the following characteris-tics:In the recommendation link,emphasizing others'recommendation mainly,multiple ways of recommendation coexist.On the evaluation subject,the emphasis is on multiple participation,dominant graduate students.In terms of selection crite-ria,the mentors'qualities are attached importance,but interaction quality with mentees are ignored.In the selection meth-od,voting or scoring is emphasized based on qualitative materials.In the incentive link,various incentive types are empha-sized,and the recognition of the achievements of the mentors is dominant.The selection system of"good mentor"in various schools generally overlook the professional value of mentors based on education,permeates with a tool-oriented value orienta-tion mainly based on quantitative evaluation,and still lacks humanistic value care for the professional development of men-tors.It is recommended that each school optimize the relevant selection system for"good mentor"to further play their lead-ing role in the construction of the mentor team.

申超;李红春

天津大学教育学院,天津 300354

教育学

好导师评选制度"双一流"建设高校

good mentorselection system"Double first-class"Construction of Universities

《教师教育研究》 2024 (004)

81-88 / 8

天津市教委社科重大项目(2021JWZD06)

评论